Skip to content
All blog
Courier Malaysia Operations Costs

Courier claims for lost and damaged parcels

David 6 min read

Parcels get lost and damaged. The rate is low and at any real volume it is not zero, and the cost lands entirely on you unless a claim is made and succeeds.

Most stores under-recover here, and the reasons are procedural rather than adversarial: nobody noticed in time, nobody had the documentation, or the amount seemed too small to bother with.

What is typically recoverable

Worth understanding the shape before designing a process around it.

Cover is usually capped at a modest amount per parcel by default, unless additional insurance was purchased at the point of shipping.

The cap is frequently below the value of the goods, particularly on higher-value items. So the default position on an expensive parcel is that you are largely self-insuring.

Time limits are short and strictly applied. A claim raised late is generally refused regardless of merit, which makes detection speed the single most important factor.

Documentation requirements are specific. Consignment note, proof of value, evidence of damage, and sometimes the packaging itself.

Some categories are excluded. Fragile goods, certain electronics, items packed inadequately. Worth reading rather than discovering during a claim.

The practical conclusion: claims are a partial recovery mechanism rather than insurance, and the decision about high-value parcels is whether to pay for additional cover, not whether the default protects you.

Detecting it in time

Since time limits are the binding constraint, detection is where the process should be strongest — and it usually is not.

Age consignments by last status change. A parcel with no update for longer than normal is the earliest signal of a loss, and it arrives well before a customer complaint — see tracking statuses and what they do not tell you.

Treat a delivery dispute as a potential claim immediately. A customer saying the parcel never arrived, against a delivered status, starts a clock. Investigating for a week and then filing is how claims expire.

Ask about condition when a customer reports a problem. Damage reported as a product fault may be a transit claim, and the distinction is worth establishing while the packaging still exists.

The common failure is that a lost parcel is handled as a customer service matter — refund the customer, close the ticket, move on — with no claim raised at all. The customer is satisfied and the loss is absorbed silently.

What to have on file

All of it should be a by-product of ordinary operations rather than assembled during a claim.

The consignment note, recorded against the order — see capturing the consignment note against the order.

The order value and the cost of goods. Claims are generally settled on value, and you need to be able to substantiate it.

Declared weight and dimensions, which also establishes whether the parcel was described accurately.

The tracking history, not just the final status, showing where the parcel stopped.

Photographs, for damage. Both the packaging and the contents, taken by whoever reports it. Asking a customer for photographs at the point they complain is normal and they generally cooperate.

Packing details where you have them, since inadequate packing is a common ground for refusal.

A store with consignment notes against orders and a tracking history already holds most of this without additional effort, which is one more return on that capture step.

Deciding whether to claim

Not every loss is worth the process, and being deliberate about it is better than being inconsistent.

Claim the material ones. Above a threshold you set, always, and file promptly.

Batch the small ones where the carrier accepts it. Several small claims submitted together are worth someone's time when individually they are not.

Track the ones you decide not to claim. This is the part that matters. Unclaimed losses recorded as a figure tell you whether the threshold is set sensibly and whether the total is large enough to justify additional cover or a different carrier.

Consider insurance on high-value parcels specifically. Not across the board, which is usually poor value, but on the parcels where the default cap is materially below the goods' value. That decision needs your own loss rate by carrier, which is a reason to measure it — see choosing couriers by destination.

Where it lands in the accounts

Four separate items, and netting them loses the picture.

The loss itself. Goods gone, at cost. This is a cost of sale or a write-off, not a reduction of revenue.

The refund to the customer, which is a revenue reversal — see returns on your own store and what they cost.

The delivery charge, which you paid and which is generally not returned.

The claim recovery, when and if it arrives — often in a later period, which means the loss and the recovery sit in different months.

Recording all four separately makes total loss and total recovery measurable. Netting them into a single adjustment produces a number nobody can interpret, and it hides whether your claim process is working at all.

Common questions

How much can you recover on a lost parcel?

Usually a capped amount per parcel under the carrier's default terms, frequently below the value of higher-value goods unless additional insurance was purchased at shipping. Claims are therefore a partial recovery mechanism rather than insurance, and the real decision on expensive parcels is whether to buy extra cover rather than whether the default is sufficient.

Why do most courier claims fail?

Because they are filed late. Time limits are short and strictly applied, so a claim raised after investigating for a week is often refused regardless of merit. The other common cause is missing documentation — no consignment note against the order, no proof of value, or no photographs of damage taken while the packaging still existed.

What is the earliest signal that a parcel is lost?

No status change for longer than normal. Ageing consignments by time since their last tracking update surfaces a probable loss well before a customer complains, which matters because detection speed is what determines whether a claim can still be filed within the time limit.

How should losses and recoveries be recorded?

As four separate items: the goods lost at cost, the refund to the customer as a revenue reversal, the delivery charge that was paid and is generally not returned, and the claim recovery if it arrives — often in a later period. Netting them into one adjustment hides both the total loss and whether the claim process is working.


Related: tracking statuses and what they do not tell you · failed deliveries and what they cost · capturing the consignment note against the order


See what you could build

Start a free trial and describe what your business needs in plain language — SmartB Studio builds the module for you.

Start free trial
Get started

No credit card · Cancel anytime · Your data stays yours